The First Ward Report – Mayor Burns strikes again!

The First Ward Report – Mayor Burns strikes again!

Just when you thought Geneva Mayor Kevin Burns couldn’t top his recent performance before the County Board’s Coronavirus Relief Fund Task Force, he managed to make that debacle look like a walk in the park without even breaking a sweat.

But before we get into his latest hijinks, let’s cover some important bases first.

The first is, I would be more than thrilled to see the RIGHT affordable housing scenario pop up in Geneva, but the proposed 8-acre 45 townhome project bordered by the Sterling Manor subdivision, the UP tracks, those Randall Road businesses, and Lewis Road is not the right development for anyone, including any potential residents.

Anytime you cram 225 economically disadvantaged people into a small geographically segregated area it’s a recipe for disaster.

Affordable Housing

There’s a reason Chicago tore down the Robert Taylor Homes and Cabrini Green and Aurora gave up on Jericho Circle. The public and affordable housing initiatives that are  successful tend to include area churches and social service agencies who work collaboratively with the municipality to integrate new residents into the community.

Another important consideration is, while the Burton Foundation has a great reputation for their senior housing developments, the same can’t be said for the rental-only project planned for Geneva. Word is, they simply let those properties rot.

Armed with executive power to run the City throughout May, the Mayor attempted to circumvent the vote and public comment requirements by pushing this plan through on June 1 when the City Council reconvened. His theory was, by the time folks figured out what happened, it would already be a done deal.

But his coronavirus cover hopes were dashed when the plan went public and a slew of concerned citizens called their aldermen and reached out to yours truly. Matters were further complicated by Sterling Manor residents hiring a law from to review the legitimacy the of the impending land sale/donation.

Now, we’re all caught up!

Though I wasn’t sure about it at the time, as it turns out, donating the land to Burton did require a special three-quarters city council majority, and since that wasn’t about to happen, the Foundation magically came up with the 600 grand required to buy the land outright.

This fiscal shift means that Burns now needs a simple two-thirds majority, or eight votes, for the land sale to pass. For reference purposes, since the ten aldermen AND the Mayor get  to vote on any City-owned land sales, for our supermajority purposes, two-thirds of eleven is eight!

And the Mayor was well on his way to securing those votes until, utterly unable to control himself once again, he single-handedly sent the whole situation sailing into a sea of serious doubt. “What did he do this time,” you ask?

In an attempt to blatantly intimidate the Genevans who sent letters and emails opposing the project, Mayor Burns told City Manager Stephanie Dawkins to publish those missives, pro and con, with all the associated names, addresses and phone numbers included.

And let me tell you, those suddenly outed opposition folks were not at all amused about becoming prime grist for the social media mill. But because these kinds of bullying effort always backfire, instead of simply calling the Second Ward aldermen, that irate group started calling all of ‘em, and that’s caused a bit of a shift to the no-vote side.

To be fair, releasing that personal information is not illegal. Someone FOIAed St. Louis to get the emails they received from citizens ratting out their neighbors and local businesses for violating COVID-19 restrictions, and the City was forced to provide those emails without any redaction.

But the fact that something’s legal doesn’t make it right. Not only was the data release a really bad idea, it was a demonstrable breach of Geneva’s own FOIA policy. And when the Mayor was backed into yet another pitchfork and torch corner, he finally ordered the personal information removed.

But it’s kinda hard to unring that bell now, isn’t it? So, what was once a slam dunk Monday evening vote is now a fraught-with-peril proposition that could go either way.

If I were to add my personal Geneva resident two cents, it would be to ask the City Council to vote against this project for the following reasons.

  • If you reward the Mayor for trying to subvert the process, he’ll just keep doing it.
  • If you reward the Mayor for trying to browbeat the opposition, he’ll just keep doing it.
  • This is not the right affordable housing initiative for Geneva or any city.
  • The Burton Foundation has a questionable reputation in the affordable housing regard.

Please remember that voting against this potential disaster does not mean the fat lady’s sung on affordable housing in Geneva. I would also encourage each of you to reach out to the fine folks at the Aurora Neighbor Project and Geneva Chapel Street Church who have a history of successfully supporting the kind of smaller scale affordable housing projects that actually work!

All that aside, it’s certainly going to be an interesting evening!

10 thoughts on “The First Ward Report – Mayor Burns strikes again!

  1. You should take a look at the history of the City Attorney too! Same attorney that was unclear on the law on the donation/sale of the land! Also, the city failed to give 2 day notice of meeting as required by law!

    1. Not sure I agree with you, Jeff, regarding the release of personal information (phone number, address, personal email) of private citizens through FOIA based on a St. Louis case. The content of the emails are subject to FOIA, the personal information is not. In fact, the release of the personal information is expressly contrary to Geneva’s own website which specifically states this personal information will not be released through FOIA. Regardless, what was done was completely wrong.

  2. So you’re saying blacks from the projects need to be segregated? They aren’t worthy to live near white people? Maybe this should be reworded with everything going on right now. However I do agree with you it will kill Geneva

    1. If someone would like to start a call list to keep these politicians phones off the hook, I’d take a time slot. I wouldn’t mind making it be a headache for them.

      Shame, affordable housing could helpful to many, but this is not a plan. There would need to be social workers & employment help on property, help from religious organizations, and a limited duration for a family to improve its situation. I will not support a plan to bring in crime & support grifters. If it’s not to be squalor, then there needs to be a serious plan.

  3. No! I said said the economically disadvantaged – black, white and brown – WILL face de facto segregation in that particular location, and that affordable housing projects tend to work when inserted into existing communities on a smaller scale.

    Did you actually read the piece?

    1. I read it, I understood what you stated, I’m a follower of yours, just watching your back, you know how shit gets twisted nowadays. If I was black I would have went down the road your are singling out blacks only because you mentioned dropping the projects and welfare.

Leave a Reply